
Comparison Bio-Scale Arboleaf vs RENPHO
Two ways to measure at home: a segmental scale with 8 electrodes and on-scale metrics (Arboleaf) versus a simple, reliable classic (RENPHO). Which one fits your protocol and habits?
Quick comparison of Lama meta-reviews
| Product | User profile | Highlights | Improvements | Meta-review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arboleaf | Users who want segmental analysis (arms/legs/torso), asymmetry tracking, and metrics visible on the scale. |
|
| View Meta-review Arboleaf |
| RENPHO | Those who prioritise very accurate weight, a clear app and multi-user support; use body fat % as a trend indicator. |
|
| View Meta-review RENPHO |
Side‑by‑side comparison
| Feature | Arboleaf | RENPHO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Arboleaf more expensive | RENPHO cheaper |
| Electrodes / type | 8 (platform + handlebar); segmental analysis. | Classic 4‑electrode (foot‑to‑foot). |
| On‑scale data | 7 metrics visible without the phone. | Primarily weight; other metrics in the app. |
| App & integrations | Arboleaf iOS/Android; Apple Health, Google Fit, Fitbit. | Very intuitive app; Apple Health, Google Fit, Fitbit, Samsung Health. |
| Subscription | Optional for extended reports; core use is free. | Not required for regular use. |
| Privacy & data | Data management with export/delete options. | Standard privacy; sync with major ecosystems. |
| Strength & rehab | Segmental view helps track asymmetries by limb. | General tracking; no per‑limb segmentation. |
| Practical accuracy | Good for trends; sensitive to protocol consistency. | Very accurate weight; body composition for trends. |
| Usage ritual | Same time (morning), after restroom, no food or training beforehand; keep the app open to log everything. | |
Important: home BIA is for trends; it does not replace clinical methods (e.g., DXA) when a healthcare decision is at stake.
Get the most out of any BIA scale
- Measure consistently: morning, fasted, after restroom, dry feet, no recent exercise.
- Avoid moving the scale; if you do, re‑calibrate before continuing.
- Focus on the trend: combine weight, circumferences and fat/water % as a guide.
Quick verdict
Choose Arboleaf if…
- You want segmental analysis by arms, legs and trunk with 8 electrodes.
- You value seeing 7 metrics on the scale without opening your phone.
- You care about asymmetries (strength/rehab) and tracking trends precisely.
Choose RENPHO if…
- Your top priority is precise weight and a very clear app.
- You want something simple and stable with multi‑user support.
- You accept body composition metrics as trend guides.
Ready to make it easy?



